allejo | tupone: I haven't had a chance to look through your PR rewriting that logic but I just plugged it into the `CustomZoneSample.bzw` example and it's not working correctly | 03:47 |
---|---|---|
allejo | in my PR the angle calculations are off too (but I think that's probably true in latest 2.4 branch) | 03:56 |
BZNotify | fix/custom-zone-rot-calc @ bzflag: allejo pushed 1 commit (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/compare/552f0b28f2f1...5b844c7799a1): | 04:09 |
BZNotify | fix/custom-zone-rot-calc @ bzflag: allejo 5b844c: Only change X/Y BBOX coordinates at 90/270 rot (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/commit/5b844c7799a18de33603d90286323e4d4af8f5e2) | 04:09 |
BZNotify | bzflag: allejo synchronized pull request #307 "Fix incorrect rotation for API custom zones" (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/pull/307) | 04:09 |
allejo | nvm I think 2.4 is fine | 04:09 |
allejo | but I agree with your comment, translating it to undo the origin would be much cheaper | 04:11 |
allejo | undo the rotation* and placement to the origin | 04:11 |
tupone | and maybe save the transformation matrix and reuse every time, maybe using glm too so we can speed up with simd | 06:08 |
tupone | with last change your PR seems doing the right thing | 06:18 |
BZNotify | bzflag: atupone synchronized pull request #308 "Rewrote check point in zone" (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/pull/308) | 06:31 |
tupone | ok, I used = instead of ==. Should be better now | 06:32 |
tupone | maybe you can test again ? | 06:41 |
*** Sgeo <Sgeo!~Sgeo@user/sgeo> has quit IRC (Read error: Connection reset by peer) | 07:42 | |
*** I_Died_Once <I_Died_Once!~I_Died_On@c-73-184-170-223.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 256 seconds) | 07:43 | |
*** I_Died_Once <I_Died_Once!~I_Died_On@c-73-184-170-223.hsd1.ga.comcast.net> has joined #bzflag | 13:24 | |
*** joes <joes!~joes@hardfought/member/joes> has joined #bzflag | 14:56 | |
*** Sgeo <Sgeo!~Sgeo@user/sgeo> has joined #bzflag | 15:07 | |
allejo | I'll give your PR another test tonight! | 16:58 |
blast007 | allejo: I was planning to submit a PR or a change to our snapcraft repo for 2.4.24. Is there a specific reason we're using the github tag snapshot URL instead of the download.bzflag.org source tar? | 17:11 |
blast007 | (if we use ours, we can include a source tar hash as well) | 17:11 |
allejo | no particular reason at all. i think it was inheritted by the original creator of that snapcraft manifest | 17:18 |
allejo | we could also point it to our github repo too if wanted to. it accepts git addresses | 17:18 |
blast007 | k, I might just point it at our download so it's consistent with other stuff | 17:20 |
allejo | that works | 17:24 |
BZNotify | bzflag: atupone synchronized pull request #308 "Rewrote check point in zone" (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/pull/308) | 18:05 |
*** spldart <spldart!~spldart@2601:2c5:c680:87a0:3210:b3ff:fef0:93af> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 260 seconds) | 19:30 | |
*** spldart <spldart!~spldart@2601:2c5:c680:87a0:3210:b3ff:fef0:93af> has joined #bzflag | 19:43 | |
BZNotify | bzflag: atupone synchronized pull request #308 "Rewrote check point in zone" (https://github.com/BZFlag-Dev/bzflag/pull/308) | 20:12 |
allejo | https://thehackernews.com/2022/03/apple-issues-patches-for-2-actively.html | 20:46 |
*** joes <joes!~joes@hardfought/member/joes> has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 272 seconds) | 21:12 | |
SpringTank | hey guys, look at /r/place! | 22:41 |
SpringTank | https://old.reddit.com/r/Superstonk/comments/tt8umb/new_8k_filing_stock_split/ | 22:41 |
SpringTank | we should do a tank or something! | 22:41 |
SpringTank | place a pixel every 5 min per person | 22:42 |
SpringTank | i was think starting a 597,91 | 22:43 |
SpringTank | no wait, 537,91 | 22:43 |
SpringTank | that might not be a good spot though | 22:44 |
SpringTank | people really like their flags, unfortunatly that's whats taken over most of the canvas | 22:45 |
Generated by irclog2html.py 2.17.3.dev0 by Marius Gedminas - find it at https://mg.pov.lt/irclog2html/!